rod goodman

Biographical Sketch

Caltech Research

Curriculum Vitae (pdf)

Consulting

Captain Rod (pdf)

The Band(pdf)

Contact

www.rodgoodman.com

robot

home

Rod Goodman B.Sc., Ph.D., C.Eng., FIET, FIEEE.

Caltech Research

Collective Robotics Neuromorphic VLSI Information Processing Systems Cognitive Systems

My research at Caltech was generally in the area of intelligent information processing systems. The goal was to design autonomous adaptive systems that learn and exhibit intelligent decision-making behavior, the emphasis being on systems. Only in a complete system do all the pieces come together: hardware, software, algorithms, and architecture. Each must work in perfect unison to obtain intelligent systems level behavior. The systems that I worked on at Caltech are in the areas of Robotics and Automation , Neuromorphic VLSI Processing , Information Processing Systems , and Cognitive Systems .

collective robotics My work in Robotics at Caltech focused on Collective Robotics and Swarm Intelligence . Here we take inspiration from biology in the way that simple low level sub-system units (such as ants) can lead to complex systems level behavior (such as the functioning of a complete nest).  We ask the question: how can we apply these principles to engineering systems? In particular, how do we design low-level behaviors for simple small robots that interact with each other and the environment to produce complex systems level behavior?    The results of this work are not only applicable to robotics. For example, we have applied these principles to routing in communications networks, and to the control of automotive traffic and satellites. At Caltech, in collaboration with Alcherio Martinoli (EPFL), Owen Holland (Sussex University), and Alan Winfield (University of the West of England), I built up a research group that focused on autonomous collective robotics. In addition to setting up a robot laboratory with a large number of robots, in 2000 we developed and taught the first ever course on Swarm Intelligence.

neuromorphic systems My second “biologically inspired” area of interest at Caltech was that of Neuromorphic VLSI Processing. These are sub-systems that emulate the neural processing that takes place in biological systems, such as those that give us our senses of vision, sound and speech, touch, and chemical sensing. The performance of these biological systems is truly impressive and motivated our research into the application of these principles to engineering systems for sensing and actuation.  The Neuromorphic approach was pioneered by Carver Mead and John Hopfield at Caltech and led to the formation of the Computation and Neural Systems (CNS) degree program, and subsequently the Caltech NSF Center for Neuromorphic Systems Engineering (CNSE), in which I served as founding Director. Within CNS my group developed the Caltech Electronic Nose , and the Caltech Silicon Active Skin – a project that combined sensing, processing, and actuation on an integrated CMOS/MEMS system chip. In addition, my Neuromorphic VLSI Processing group researched and demonstrated VLSI systems for on-chip Neural Network Learning, high capacity Neural Associative Memories which can perform real-time vector quantization on images, as well as chips for Video Contrast Enhancement, Color Constancy , and Stereopsis .

informarion processing systemsMy third research area at Caltech was in the area of Information Processing Systems . This work is more “algorithmically based” and built on my past work in Neural Networks, Machine Learning, and Information Theory and Coding. It focused on building system applications such as: Texture Recognition, Object Recognition, Handwritten Document Analysis, Cursive Keyword Spotting, and Smart Web Searching. In particular, my information processing research has resulted in an information theoretic approach to modeling decision systems which extends from the automated capture of knowledge in the form of Rules, to the implementation of Bayesian probabilistic inference systems on multi-layered parallel Neural Networks. Thus, the machine learns automatically from experience, executes its knowledge in true real-time and its decisions are understandable to humans because the knowledge is in the form of human-readable “rules”. This approach was also applied to modeling and controlling Telephone Traffic, building neural networks that can discover State Machines and Grammars, and networks that can analyze music and then create new music: The ADMIRE System. Neural network algorithms for control applications were also investigated. Neural networks are capable of learning complex non-linear dynamics, which are difficult to model mathematically. In particular, we developed neuro controllers that combine linear and non-linear control theory, Fuzzy Rules, and Case Based Reasoning, to produce more robust controllers than are achievable with one technique alone.

cognitive systemsMy fourth research area at Caltech was that of Cognitive Systems and Machine Consciousness. I am interested in discovering the “reason” for consciousness in higher mammals, and why biology has evolved this system for the control of complex organisms.  The goal is to then use these principles as the guiding architecture for Adaptive Learning Robot Controllers. In 2001 Christof Koch, David Chalmers, Owen Holland , and I organized the first ever conference on Machine Consciousness which brought together Biologists, Engineers, Ethicists, and Philosophers at the Banbury Center of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, to discuss Can a Machine be Conscious?

top